Skip to the content
Documentation
Help Start
Reading in:
  • German: 9,059 of 9,059 pages
About the help in other languages
All help pages

The EU Web Accessibility Directive and Exponential

For EU public sector bodies - what the Web Accessibility Directive (EU) 2016/2102 asks of a website in general terms, and which part of each duty Exponential covers, which part your site and your organization cover.

Download as PDF

Address: https://doc.exponential.earth/exphelp/viewer/help/government/accessibility/web-accessibility-directive.md

On this page

The EU Web Accessibility Directive and Exponential

This page is for public sector bodies in the European Union that run a website with Exponential. It describes the duties of the Web Accessibility Directive in general terms and, for each one, what the software provides according to Accessibility standards. The binding rules are those of your member state's transposition.

Note This page describes features and common practice; it is not legal advice. Check the law that applies to your organization with your legal counsel.

Contents

  1. The directive in brief
  2. Duty by duty
  3. A working plan
  4. Pitfalls
  5. Related pages

The directive in brief

Directive (EU) 2016/2102 on the accessibility of the websites and mobile applications of public sector bodies (official text: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2016/2102/oj) requires member states to make sure that public sector bodies make their websites and apps perceivable, operable, understandable and robust. The technical reference is the harmonized standard EN 301 549 (v3.2.1, published by ETSI: https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/301500_301599/301549/03.02.01_60/en_301549v030201p.pdf), whose web clause incorporates WCAG 2.1 level AA. The directive also asks for an accessibility statement, a feedback mechanism, and monitoring and reporting by the member states.

Duty by duty

Duty (general terms)What Exponential providesWhat you do
Accessible website content (EN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1 AA)the editing tool (admin4) is tested against WCAG 2.2 AA, a superset of 2.1 AA except 4.1.1 Parsing; status Partly complies; EN 301 549 Unverifiedbuild or buy an accessible public design and audit it; WCAG 2.2 AA is a safe target because it contains 2.1 AA
Accessible content published by staffan alternative text field on images that a class can make required; headings, table captions and header cells in rich texttrain editors; require alternative text on image fields; check documents before upload
Accessibility statementno template ships (named as a gap in the project's statement)write it from the model your member state publishes; see "Writing an accessibility statement" in this section
Feedback mechanismcontact forms can be built with the information collector (Collected information)add a contact link to the statement; answer within the time your law sets
Disproportionate burden (where your law allows it)nothing in the softwaredocument the assessment yourself; it is an organizational decision
Monitoring by the member statenothing in the softwarekeep audit reports and fix lists ready for the monitoring body

A working plan

  1. Set the target. WCAG 2.2 AA for new work; it covers what EN 301 549 clause 9 asks.
  2. Choose the administration design. Keep editors on admin4 (or admin4l), the design the project tests (The admin4 design).
  3. Audit the public design with a representative sample, as WCAG-EM describes (https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG-EM/). Record findings with the success criterion and the template to fix.
  4. Fix template issues first: one template fix repairs every page that uses it.
  5. Make alternative text required on the image attributes of your content classes (class edit, option "Alternative text is required").
  6. Publish the statement as a normal content page, linked from every page footer.
  7. Repeat the audit after redesigns and at the interval your monitoring body expects.

Pitfalls

  • Declaring the site compliant because the CMS is "accessible". The project's own statement rates the administration "Partly complies" and the public designs "not audited". Your statement is about your site.
  • Forgetting documents. PDF and office files linked from pages are content too; see "Documents and PDFs" in this section.
  • Leaving editors without guidance. Most regressions after launch come from content, not templates.
  • Online editor output. The TinyMCE integrations were not audited (status Unverified); check the HTML your editors' rich text produces in your audit sample.

Become an Exponential Partner

Partners share their information, provide funding, contribute back and develop the products with us, and that is how Exponential grows. A partner website and dashboard are planned for mid-2027: please become a partner today to speed up our growth rate and land new features faster.

Something wrong on this page? Report an error

Documentation license

This documentation is free documentation, licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3 or later.

Exponential Copyright © 1998-2026 Exponential Foundation and 7x